28 November 2019
Tougher regulation forcing change
We recently travelled to Silicon Valley to find out how the big tech firms were adapting to greater scrutiny from regulators and politicians, tighter controls from mobile platforms and increased self-policing. Following meetings with senior executives at Facebook, Google, Pinterest, Snapchat and Twitter, the view is that tighter regulation has indeed hit firms’ ability to offer targeted advertisements. But different companies will be affected to varying degrees.
As traditional media ad platforms such as television, radio and billboards get incrementally ‘smarter’ in understanding their audience through technology, the question is whether ever-increasing restrictions on internet platforms will eventually level the playing field.
Previously, companies such as Facebook, and Google to a lesser extent, were able to use and monetise data without any restrictions. As the key ingredient - user data - was freely available, the result was a high growth, high margin business. Being able to track how users found a product and why they bought it, and attach that information to an actual sale, is every marketer’s dream; internet platforms were able to prove attribution from product discovery to point of sale smoothly and effectively. However, tougher regulation has put restrictions on this data usage. As a result, companies now have to find different routes to monetise their audience (if users opt for reduced data sharing). This increases the costs for these internet firms and reduces the return on investment for their clients.
Facebook, for instance, is developing “statistical” workarounds for cases where they cannot use data as a direct result of increased privacy following European privacy and data protection rules. Meanwhile, Google - which is less affected by these rules because search engine revenue is a significant part of its advertising business - plans to prompt users at regular intervals to reconsider security and privacy settings. The hope is that users will realise the benefits of targeted, useful advertisements versus non targeted, generic advertisements.
Facebook, in particular, has come under pressure following a string of embarrassing security breaches and fake news scandals. The company told us it is taking down 2.5 billion fake accounts every quarter, compared to 2.45 billion of active monthly users. These are significant numbers. Steps have also been taken to improve data safety. But despite these measures, I remain unconvinced as to whether this signals a big shift for a company looking at different ways to monetise data, or if this is just a box-ticking exercise to keep regulators on side.
Almost every company we met told us that they were focused on ensuring that policymakers understand the trade-off between increased regulation and the US having a competitive edge over China. Data is, of course, a key ingredient needed to improve machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms. Social media companies have real ‘use cases’ to monetise AI innovations almost instantaneously. Their worry is that over-regulation will throw the proverbial baby out with the bath water, leaving US firms playing catch-up as China - which faces none of these data restrictions - races ahead in AI and machine learning.
In fact, a chief executive of one of the smaller internet firms told us there was a real fear that the smaller and less resourced tech firms would be hit by the “unintended shrapnel” of increased regulation aimed at the bigger tech firms such as Facebook and Google. These rules are already raising the barriers to entry and could have the unintended effect of making the big firms even more powerful.
The road ahead
Increased scrutiny around user privacy is bringing about real change in how internet companies monetise user data. Business models are being modified to pacify regulators, politicians and the public. Globally though, cultural norms and demographics will define how many users adopt increased privacy settings and stick with them. The real fear in Silicon Valley is that over-zealous regulation could slow down the pace of US tech innovation, falling behind China. Of course, only time will tell if limiting access to data is enough to hinder US companies. Nevertheless, given China’s leadership in ‘future connectivity’ with aggressive 5G adoption and the lack of user data restriction, the cards seem stacked in China’s favour for now.
This document is for Investment Professionals only and should not be relied on by private investors.
This document is provided for information purposes only and is intended only for the person or entity to which it is sent. It must not be reproduced or circulated to any other party without prior permission of Fidelity.
This document does not constitute a distribution, an offer or solicitation to engage the investment management services of Fidelity, or an offer to buy or sell or the solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or offer is not authorised or would be contrary to local laws or regulations. Fidelity makes no representations that the contents are appropriate for use in all locations or that the transactions or services discussed are available or appropriate for sale or use in all jurisdictions or countries or by all investors or counterparties.
This communication is not directed at, and must not be acted on by persons inside the United States and is otherwise only directed at persons residing in jurisdictions where the relevant funds are authorised for distribution or where no such authorisation is required. Fidelity is not authorised to manage or distribute investment funds or products in, or to provide investment management or advisory services to persons resident in, mainland China. All persons and entities accessing the information do so on their own initiative and are responsible for compliance with applicable local laws and regulations and should consult their professional advisers.
Reference in this document to specific securities should not be interpreted as a recommendation to buy or sell these securities, but is included for the purposes of illustration only. Investors should also note that the views expressed may no longer be current and may have already been acted upon by Fidelity. The research and analysis used in this documentation is gathered by Fidelity for its use as an investment manager and may have already been acted upon for its own purposes. This material was created by Fidelity International.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.
This document may contain materials from third-parties which are supplied by companies that are not affiliated with any Fidelity entity (Third-Party Content). Fidelity has not been involved in the preparation, adoption or editing of such third-party materials and does not explicitly or implicitly endorse or approve such content.
Fidelity International refers to the group of companies which form the global investment management organization that provides products and services in designated jurisdictions outside of North America Fidelity, Fidelity International, the Fidelity International logo and F symbol are trademarks of FIL Limited. Fidelity only offers information on products and services and does not provide investment advice based on individual circumstances.
Issued in Europe: Issued by FIL Investments International (FCA registered number 122170) a firm authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, FIL (Luxembourg) S.A., authorised and supervised by the CSSF (Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier) and FIL Investment Switzerland AG, authorised and supervised by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA. For German wholesale clients issued by FIL Investment Services GmbH, Kastanienhöhe 1, 61476 Kronberg im Taunus. For German Institutional clients issued by FIL (Luxembourg) S.A., 2a, rue Albert Borschette BP 2174 L-1021 Luxembourg.
In Hong Kong, this document is issued by FIL Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited and it has not been reviewed by the Securities and Future Commission. FIL Investment Management (Singapore) Limited (Co. Reg. No: 199006300E) is the legal representative of Fidelity International in Singapore. FIL Asset Management (Korea) Limited is the legal representative of Fidelity International in Korea. In Taiwan, Independently operated by FIL Securities (Taiwan ) Limited, 11F, 68 Zhongxiao East Road., Section 5, Xinyi Dist., Taipei City, Taiwan 11065, R.O.C Customer Service Number: 0800-00-9911#2 .
Issued in Australia by Fidelity Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited ABN 33 148 059 009, AFSL No. 409340 (“Fidelity Australia”). This material has not been prepared specifically for Australian investors and may contain information which is not prepared in accordance with Australian law.